Concentration camps and death marches are a thing many people think of from WWII Germany and Japanese and other country's Not here. But We had them to will we have them again?
“Norman Yoshio Mineta, (Japanese: 峯田良雄, Mineta Yoshio; born November 12, 1931) is a United States politician of the Democratic Party. Mineta most recently served in President George W. Bush's Cabinet as the United States Secretary of Transportation, the only Democratic Cabinet Secretary in the Bush administration. “ . www.wikipedia.org

“On September 21, 2001, Mineta sent a letter to all U.S. airlines forbidding them from practicing racial profiling; or subjecting Middle Eastern or Muslim passengers to a heightened degree of pre-flight scrutiny. He stated that it was illegal for the airlines to discriminate against passengers based on their race, color, national or ethnic origin or religion. Subsequently, administrative enforcement actions were brought against three different airlines based on alleged contraventions of these rules, resulting in multi-million dollar settlements. He showed his intention "absolutely not" to implement racial screenings in reply to the question from Steve Kroft on "60 Minutes" right after 9-11. He later recalled his decision "was the right thing (and) constitutional", based on his own experience as one of Japanese-Americans, those who had "lost the most basic human rights" by being discriminated and interned during Pacific War.” www.wikipedia.org



The Japanese American were not the only ones in the US history that have ben Marched many miles to Internments and prisons.
The Native American Peoples were removed from their lands and Marched to reservations often as much as 1000miles.
The Trail of Tears of the 5 civilized tribes as they were then known was not the only march.
The Navaho have their own and so have Apaches The Chiricahua Apache were marched from southern Arizona to Oklahoma. many of their people housed in prisons for many years,

there are still Native Americans imprisoned 
American Indian Movement (AIM) activist Leonard Peltier
His crime being in the way of J Edgar Hoovers plans.

Now it is the turn of the Muslims and the Latinos.
In 1776, John Adams published "Thoughts on Government," in which he praises the Islamic prophet Muhammad as a "sober inquirer after truth" alongside Confucius, Zoroaster, Socrates, and other thinkers. www.wikipedia.org
This is Mohamid Ali the Great American Boxer. Should he be interned?
In 1785, George Washington stated a willingness to hire "Mahometans," as well as people of any nation or religion, to work on his private estate at Mount Vernon if they were "good workmen." It was a rhetorical statement, as he hired no such people. www.wikipedia.org
And Kareem Abdul-Jabbar. How about Him?
When Benjamin Franklin helped establish a non-denominational religious meeting house in Philadelphia, he emphasized its non-sectarian nature by stating that "even if the Mufti of Constantinople were to send a missionary to preach Mohammedanism to us, he would find a pulpit at his service". www.wikipedia.org
Even With the Founding fathers Having had no issue with Muslims in the USA as Americans the modern conservatives that speak of the the founding fathers as if they where Saints they are very biased against Muslims.
Reuters) - American Muslims face a rising tide of religious discrimination in U.S. communities, workplaces and schools nearly a decade after the September 11 attacks, a congressional committee heard on Tuesday.
Evidence of growing anti-Muslim bigotry, aired at a Senate Judiciary subcommittee hearing, poses a challenge for President Barack Obama as his administration works to foster good relations with American Muslims and secure their help against the threat of home-grown terrorism.
But the challenge is compounded by remarks by public officials and others in prominent positions that have inflamed public debate and threaten to facilitate discrimination, according to witness testimony.http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/03/29/muslim-discrimination-cas_n_842076.htm
Four US airlines were taken to court yesterday for racial discrimination, accused of removing passengers from their flights as a terrorist risk because of their skin color.
The American Civil Liberties Union (Alco) sued the airlines, Continental, American, Northwest and United, on behalf of five men who claimed to have been the victims of racial profiling. Two of the five were US citizens of Arab descent, one was a Guyanese-American and another was a Bangladeshi-American. http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2002/jun/05/theairlineindustry.usnews
The Latino Americans are also under attack SB 1070 was passed in AZ with the presumption of curbing entry into the USA of people from other country's. It does nothing of the sort. If it had been permitted to go forward in its entirety it would have and will discriminate against American Citizens as much as non-citizens of color. These statement about a suit against the law highlights the acts it violates.
The suit seeks to prevent SB 1070 from going into effect by charging that it:
- violates the federal Supremacy Clause by attempting to bypass federal immigration law;
- violates the Fourteenth Amendment and Equal Protection Clause rights of racial and national origin minorities by subjecting them to stops, detentions, and arrests based on their race or origin;
- violates the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech by exposing speakers to scrutiny based on their language or accent;
- violates the Fourth Amendment's prohibition of unreasonable searches and seizures because it allows for warrantless searches in absence of probable cause;
- violates the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause by being impermissibly vague;
- and infringes on constitutional provisions that protect the right to travel without being stopped, questioned, or detained
The Alabama immigration law goes even farther in discrimination against American citizens.
What next For Latinos?
This story tells about a suit against the Maricopa county sheriffs office
A judge Wednesday awarded $94,000 in fees and other costs to lawyers representing a handful of Latinos in a lawsuit that alleges racial profiling in Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio's immigration patrols.
http://www.azcentral.com/news/election/azelections/articles/2011/06/08/20110608joe-arpaio-immigration-sweep-lawsuit.html#ixzz1d9w3GGPl
Snow issued a ruling last year finding grounds to sanction the agency for having shredded officers' records of traffic stops made during the patrols, but he held off on issuing the punishment.
Later, some immigration-patrol-related emails that were thought to have been deleted by the sheriff's office turned out to have been saved by the county as part of an unrelated lawsuit.
During the patrols, deputies flood an area of a city - in some cases, heavily Latino areas - over several days to seek out traffic violators and arrest other offenders.
Critics say Arpaio's deputies target people for minor traffic infractions based on their skin color so they can ask for proof of citizenship.
Arpaio has denied allegations of racial profiling, saying people are stopped if deputies have probable cause to believe they've committed crimes, and that deputies later find many of them are illegal immigrants.
Yet Arpaio continues to do what he has been doing all along.
And GOP presidential candidates are scrambling for his endorsement because of this.
Perry, Bachmann, Cain have each made appeal to him.
Rick Perry-Joe Arpaio Immigration
Perry isn’t the first Republican to move right on immigration in an effort to appeal to anti-immigration conservatives. In 2010, Sen. John McCain (R-AZ), who had been the party’s foremost supporter of immigration reform during the Bush administration, ran to the right to support completing the “danged fence” in order to appeal to conservative primary voters. Perry’s stance on immigration was perhaps the only moderate stance he holds, and it appears to be fading fast.
http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2011/09/05/311708/rick-perry-joe-arpaio-immigration/
What next for Latinos and Muslims? Internment camps?